Would it be true?

I watched the Buletin Utama on TV3 just now.. One of the news was Malaysia are going to reconsider the proposal of using Nuclear energy as an energy to generate the electricity in Malaysia.. One of the reason is the coal and gas resources are going to be depleted in the next 20 years..Before this, Malaysia had proposed about it but later we found another 'black gold' well, thus the plan was terminated (i'm not sure where is the new location situated).

Based on the research made by the scientists, the nuclear energy releases the smallest amount of carbon dioxide to the environment.. So, it is called as a friendly-environment resources and many countries in this world has already initiated their effort in order to fully harness the efficient of this renewable source eg. South Korea, US, Iran etc.


However, a place where the wasted radioactive materials will be kept is debatable among scientists..From Mr. Tan's lecture, he said the place is not safe for a limitless time..If something bad happens eg. war, natural disasters (volcano eruption, earthquake) the radioactive would leak to environment and human being would be exposed to it. Consequently, lots of problem will raise from the horrific event.

Erm, I think it is my duty as future Chemical Engineer to search for a new renewable resource which is much more better than nuclear and bio fuel energy..Please do not be surprised if my name is listed on the inventors of the newest renewable energy in the next 15-20 years..hehe


2 Responses
  1. Ilyana Says:

    yeah~ keep up ur great job.
    hehe..revealing the truth.